Banner-biblio-logo-bordo
Vista normal Vista MARC Vista ISBD

Negotiating ungovernable spaces between the personal and the political: Oral history and the left in post-war Britain

Por: Hughes, Celia.
Tipo de material: ArtículoArtículoTipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: sin mediación Tipo de portador: Volumen Tema(s): MILITANCIA | FAMILIA | 1968 | MOVIMIENTOS ESTUDIANTILES | MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES | INGLATERRA En: Memory studies. 2013; Vol.6, nro.1 58 (vol.2, nro.1) En: Memory studies
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras Reserva de ítems
REVISTAS REVISTAS Biblioteca del IDES
Colección Especial Memoria Social - Publicaciones seriadas 58 (vol.6, nro.1) (Navegar estantería) vol.6, nro.1 Disponible 21936
Total de reservas: 0

[Abstract The collective memory of the Italian 1968 has been defined as a ‘possessive memory’, shaped by its most influential protagonists from the main urban centres, who also became its most influential historians. The ‘marginal’ areas of the Italian movement, which was characterised by its length and breadth in geography and society, have for long time been left aside. Furthermore, persistent ‘dark sides’ and historiographical gaps still remain to be explored. One of these is the ‘private side’ of 1968, in particular, with regard to the ‘family’ and its alternative everyday lifestyles, strikingly within a movement whose main historical characteristic has been defined as ‘the emergence of subjectivity in the public sphere’. This article addresses these two main neglected aspects of the Italian 1968, the geographical margins and the ‘private side’ of the family and alternative lifestyles, by concentrating on a provincial area of the Marche region (Macerata), in Central Italy. Exploring memories and raw material through oral history and micro-historical focus, it concentrates on a group of militants attempting to set up an alternative ‘hippy’ community and to experience alternative lifestyles. By looking at their collective memory and experience of 1968 in contention as well as in dialogue with codified histories and master-narratives, it will be shown that dominant categories and the codified historiography of the Italian movement either do not apply or have a different meaning. In doing so, I will argue that memory can shed light on the relevance of ‘place’, as well as on the relationship between the ‘global’ and the ‘local’, in the historical understanding of the essence and legacy of 1968. Collective memory everyday life family margins participation personal revolution]

No hay comentarios para este ejemplar.

Ingresar a su cuenta para colocar un comentario.